Empowering Trust with Verifiable Private Identity – The Future of Digital Data Control

A 223 Group analysis of Terminal 3’s report on Verifiable Private Identity (VPI), exploring how zero-knowledge proofs, verifiable credentials, and decentralized identity frameworks are reshaping digital trust, compliance, and user control in the data economy.

Empowering Trust with Verifiable Private Identity – The Future of Digital Data Control

The management of personal data is at a turning point. For decades, governments and enterprises stored and controlled massive amounts of identity information for compliance, commerce, and strategy. Now, users themselves are demanding control over their data. Terminal 3’s June 2025 report frames this shift as the rise of Verifiable Private Identity (VPI) — an identity model that combines zero-knowledge proofs with verifiable credentials to balance security, compliance, and user sovereignty.

The report highlights the fundamental problem: centralized identity systems are increasingly unfit for purpose. Nearly 49% of enterprises plan to overhaul their Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) systems by 2025, reflecting growing dissatisfaction with legacy solutions. These systems create silos, increase costs, and introduce single points of failure. Breaches like the 2022 Okta incident, which exposed the identity data of 366 companies, illustrate how centralized models amplify systemic risk. At scale, the costs are significant: storing 10PB of customer data can reach $30 million per year, not including the reputational damage of breaches.

Verifiable Private Identity addresses these shortcomings by shifting ownership from institutions to individuals. Instead of entrusting personal data to centralized databases, users maintain portable identity credentials that can be verified without being revealed. Zero-knowledge proofs ensure that users can prove compliance (e.g., age, residency, accreditation) without exposing sensitive underlying information. Institutions benefit from streamlined compliance workflows, reduced liability, and minimized data storage costs.

From an institutional standpoint, this is more than an IT upgrade. It’s a structural shift in the trust economy. Digital identity is now the backbone of every meaningful interaction, from banking and healthcare to government services and e-commerce. As AI and quantum computing accelerate new threat vectors, the need for privacy-preserving, tamper-resistant, and interoperable identity solutions is no longer optional — it is existential.

The report positions VPI as the next step in digital identity’s evolution, moving beyond traditional CIAM toward user-centric frameworks. For enterprises, this means:

• Compliance efficiency: automating KYC/AML checks without storing raw data.
• Security resilience: eliminating single points of failure by decentralizing verification.
• User trust: restoring confidence by granting individuals control over their identity data.
• Interoperability: enabling seamless recognition across platforms, borders, and regulatory regimes.

Yet challenges remain. Vendor lock-in is a risk as enterprises migrate to new identity frameworks. Interoperability standards must mature to ensure that credentials are portable across jurisdictions. Regulators will need to balance the benefits of decentralized identity with obligations for auditability, law enforcement, and consumer protection.

For sophisticated investors and strategists, the implications are twofold. First, identity infrastructure is becoming an investable theme within digital assets and Web3. Exposure to providers of decentralized identity, verifiable credential frameworks, and zero-knowledge infrastructure offers asymmetric upside as adoption scales. Second, enterprises that adopt VPI early can reduce compliance costs, mitigate breach liabilities, and strengthen customer loyalty in an increasingly privacy-conscious market.

From a strategic allocation perspective, the 223 Group advises treating Verifiable Private Identity as a core infrastructure layer of the digital economy, on par with payments, settlement, and data storage. As decentralized identity frameworks converge with tokenized assets, CBDCs, and AI-driven verification systems, VPI will underpin the next generation of global financial and digital interactions.

Terminal 3’s report ultimately frames this as a trust transformation. The digital economy cannot thrive on fragile, centralized systems that compromise both user security and enterprise resilience. Instead, the future belongs to identity models that empower individuals, streamline institutional compliance, and transcend national boundaries.

The story here is not whether decentralized identity will emerge, but how fast and at what scale. For institutions, the strategic question is whether to wait for regulatory mandates or to embrace the opportunity now — shaping the standards, governance, and adoption curves of the next digital identity era.

‍